disclaimer: the following is more logic exercise than economic analysis...
Moot Debate - Misses the Big Picture
Most frequently, the debate around inflation revolves around the all-encompassing metric known as CPI (consumer price index). Today's pundits debate endlessly about the future trajectory of the CPI. However, perhaps speculating what the CPI will be in totality may be missing some important scenarios...
Let us divide goods into two categories and discuss the inflation outlook for each category separately...
The Humble Goods
First, let's talk about the essential commodity goods. Primarily I am thinking of such items as wheat, grain, milk, orange juice, coffee, oil, water, corn, sugar, etc. These are items that most people need to survive, and that are not produced in factories, but must be grown on agricultural land (whether directly or implicity, ie cows eating grass and then producing milk).
My (unsupported) conjecture is that these goods did not suffer the gluttony of overinvestment/overcapacity during the boom-period. Logically speaking, most people with reasonable living standards do not eat significantly more wheat during boom periods than what's needed to keep them alive. Hence, there's little reason to believe that we developed significantly more farms during the boom period than we needed. Furthermore, most people, with the means to, will continue consuming wheat at a stable pace (sustenance). In fact, global population trends suggest that demand for such commodity goods will continue to increase as populations increase (more grain/wheat) and living standards rise (sugar/milk).
Based upon this line of reasoning, it seems plausible to suggest that such essential commodities are unlikely to experience sustained, long-term price declines. What about price inflation? As central banks around the world work to fight deflation (as measured by simple metrics such as CPI), they will likely increase the monetary base, thereby potentially fueling price inflation in these humbler goods.
Other commodities, such as metals, are more ambiguous. The problem is that steel, concrete, etc are tied to the 2nd group of goods/services more so than wheat/grain. Though we may experience price inflation in food, prices of wood may not increase, because we don't necessarily need more wood to build more houses... more detailed discussion below.
Gold/Silver are unique metals though, since they're value is derived not from industrial use...
The Luxury Goods
It's difficult to exactly define what goods (services) fall in which category, so I'll give some more examples of the type of items I am referring to here: TV's, consumer electronics, housing, auto, mall retailers, casual dining restaurants, computers, and all the various sub-industries that feed off/into the aforementioned. In general, anything that people don't need to directly eat (to survive).
In my opinion, during the boom-years we either produced too many luxury goods (homes) or overinvested in the capacity to produce such goods (ie factories, workers). The extra money that people had which they did not use to buy more wheat was used to buy LCD TV's, ipods, and a nice meal at Applebees. With the decrease in disposable income, consumers will shun these items as they attempt to rebuild household balance sheets, and prepare to retire significantly later than they had originally hoped/anticipated. These are powerful market forces, and will likely lead to irresistible deflationary pressures.
However, as said before, central banks (and political institutions) need to prevent deflation - economically because of the deathly fear of deflationary spiral, and politically because most export industries (except may Canada, Australia, South Africa, Middle East) rely primarily on luxury goods. They will likely summon a variety of tools to their cause, with the likely outcome of increasing the monetary base. In the aftermath, their policies may very well stop price deflation in these luxury goods, but not without significant price inflation in the humbler goods.
Ramifications
These are too numerous to recount. However, most likely this policy bodes ill for middle-class and lower-class families. With less to spend already due to the recession (depression), they will be devoting a greater portion of their wages to essential goods. With increased price inflation on bread, rice, and water, these families will likely feel further disenfranchised by policy makers, as they find themselves trapped between the proverbial rock and hard place.
In addition, CPI may very well remain flat, or increase moderately for a period. While policy makers cheer the success of their experimentation (make no mistake, that is what it is...), the villagers will be sharpening their pitchforks and pouring kerosene on their torches, as they find themselves struggling more and more just to put food in their mouths...
Though we are few, I am not alone...
Maybe it's time to buy a tract of land, plant some corn, and learn the banjo...?
Disclaimer - the below graph has cherry-picked data to illustrate my point... I don't believe that the longer-term past is as representative of the near/medium future...
If I had (originally bought) the fossilized remains of the specimens, I would also be able to show the similar extinction pattern of a variety of other species:
, Glaucon, in an attempt to define morality, describes what he believes to be the consummate moral person...
gives an historical account of the infamous hyperinflation saga of Germany's Weimar Republic. In addition, he goes into depth about the history of inflation in our country.
Hardin argues that 'discrimination is a necessary part of every persisting altruistic behavior. Why? Because without discrimination the good effects of altruism would be commonized over the entire population.' One alternative to discriminating altruism would be universal altruism - a noble intention indeed. However, it is pointed out that 'the specific shortcoming of universalism is easy to identify: it promotes a pathology... namely the tragedy of the commons'.